Review





Similar Products

99
MyoLearn electromyography (emg) research
Electromyography (Emg) Research, supplied by MyoLearn, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/Electromyography+(EMG)+Research/custom%40emg%4010%2E1142%2FS1013702526500083
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electromyography (emg) research - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Guangzhou JET Bio-Filtration calcium (ca) colorimetric assay kit
Calcium (Ca) Colorimetric Assay Kit, supplied by Guangzhou JET Bio-Filtration, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/Calcium+(Ca)+Colorimetric+Assay+Kit/custom%40e-bc-k103-m%4042744042
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
calcium (ca) colorimetric assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress usp7 inhibition
Usp7 Inhibition, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/USP7%2C+Human/10__1186_slash_s10020___026___01638___7-70-1-6
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
usp7 inhibition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
TargetMol vivo pharmacological inhibition
NSUN2 promotes LUAD progression in an immunity-dependent manner. A Immunoblot analysis confirmed efficient knockdown of Nsun2 in LLC cells and its complete knockout in KP cells. B CCK-8 analysis of the proliferation of LLC and KP cells following Nsun2 depletion or pharmacological <t>inhibition</t> of NSUN2 with MY-1B (20µM) ( n = 3 per group). C Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5 per group). D Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice (control, n = 5; NSUN2 KO, n = 6). E Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 ⁻/⁻ mice ( n = 5 per group). F Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 -/- mice ( n = 5 per group). G Schematic diagram illustrating the induction of LUAD in KrasLSL −G12D/+ , Sftpc-MerCreMer genetically engineered mice with or without conditional knockout of Nsun2. H Representative H&E‑stained lung images (left) and the corresponding tumor area annotations (right, in red) from mice with spontaneous LUAD (Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox ). Scale bar, 200 μm. I Quantification of tumor burden from the spontaneous LUAD model in Nsun2 +/+ and Nsun2 flox/flox mice ( n = 6 per group). J Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox mice in the spontaneous LUAD model ( n = 7 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant
Vivo Pharmacological Inhibition, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/MY-1B/pmc13548626-116-2-14
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vivo pharmacological inhibition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress ampk inhibition
Melatonin activates <t>AMPK</t> signaling and enhances mitochondrial function in vitro. (A) GO enrichment bar plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Control and Melatonin-treated NSCs. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment bar plot of DEGs between Control and Melatonin groups. (C) Heatmap of selected DEGs associated with neuronal differentiation and mitochondrial function. DEGs were defined as transcripts with FDR <0.05. (D) Representative Western blots showing phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK, Thr172) and phosphorylated ACC (p-ACC, Ser79) in Control, Melatonin, Inhibitor, and Melatonin + Inhibitor groups. (E) Densitometric analysis of p-AMPK/total AMPK and p-ACC/GAPDH ratios. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ppargc1a and Tfam expression, normalized to GAPDH and presented as fold change relative to the Control group. (G) Representative Western blots of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes I-V. (H) Densitometric quantification of OXPHOS complexes I-V, normalized to GAPDH (or the corresponding loading control). (I) Representative JC-1 fluorescence images indicating mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). (J) Quantification of the red/green JC-1 fluorescence ratio from (I). (K) Schematic representation of the proposed melatonin-AMPK-ACC-PGC-1α-NRF1/TFAM signaling axis driving mitochondrial biogenesis in NSCs. All quantitative data (E, F, H, J) are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. K created with BioRender.com .
Ampk Inhibition, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/BAY-3827/pmc13091134-73-1-6
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ampk inhibition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress ccr2 inhibition
Immune regulation and endogenous bone regeneration mechanism investigation. A) Network diagram showing the number of interactions between six subclusters. B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs in DIBS group compared to the HA group. C) Circular visualization of related pathway–gene enrichment analysis. D) Heatmap of key gene regulation in specific pathways. E) qRT-PCR validation for key gene expression in specific pathways. F) The interaction networks showing the correlation of representative immunomodulatory genes (CCL2, CCL20, Sfrp1, and Stat3, etc.) with angiogenesis/osteogenesis and macrophage regulation gene sets. G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of <t>CCR2</t> F4/80 macrophage in peripheral blood. H) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of macrophage polarization inside scaffolds (one week after intramuscular implantation). I) Macrophage proliferation assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. J and K) Macrophage polarization assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.
Ccr2 Inhibition, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/CCR2%2C+Mouse/pmc13094449-553-5-25
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ccr2 inhibition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress camostat inhibition
Immune regulation and endogenous bone regeneration mechanism investigation. A) Network diagram showing the number of interactions between six subclusters. B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs in DIBS group compared to the HA group. C) Circular visualization of related pathway–gene enrichment analysis. D) Heatmap of key gene regulation in specific pathways. E) qRT-PCR validation for key gene expression in specific pathways. F) The interaction networks showing the correlation of representative immunomodulatory genes (CCL2, CCL20, Sfrp1, and Stat3, etc.) with angiogenesis/osteogenesis and macrophage regulation gene sets. G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of <t>CCR2</t> F4/80 macrophage in peripheral blood. H) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of macrophage polarization inside scaffolds (one week after intramuscular implantation). I) Macrophage proliferation assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. J and K) Macrophage polarization assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.
Camostat Inhibition, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neuron+modulation+or+inhibition/Camostat/10__1016_slash_j__bsheal__2026__09__002-105-1-20
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
camostat inhibition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


NSUN2 promotes LUAD progression in an immunity-dependent manner. A Immunoblot analysis confirmed efficient knockdown of Nsun2 in LLC cells and its complete knockout in KP cells. B CCK-8 analysis of the proliferation of LLC and KP cells following Nsun2 depletion or pharmacological inhibition of NSUN2 with MY-1B (20µM) ( n = 3 per group). C Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5 per group). D Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice (control, n = 5; NSUN2 KO, n = 6). E Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 ⁻/⁻ mice ( n = 5 per group). F Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 -/- mice ( n = 5 per group). G Schematic diagram illustrating the induction of LUAD in KrasLSL −G12D/+ , Sftpc-MerCreMer genetically engineered mice with or without conditional knockout of Nsun2. H Representative H&E‑stained lung images (left) and the corresponding tumor area annotations (right, in red) from mice with spontaneous LUAD (Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox ). Scale bar, 200 μm. I Quantification of tumor burden from the spontaneous LUAD model in Nsun2 +/+ and Nsun2 flox/flox mice ( n = 6 per group). J Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox mice in the spontaneous LUAD model ( n = 7 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant

Journal: Experimental Hematology & Oncology

Article Title: Tumor-intrinsic NSUN2 orchestrates immunosuppression in lung adenocarcinoma via the m 5 C-HDAC8-CCL5 axis

doi: 10.1186/s40164-026-00826-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: NSUN2 promotes LUAD progression in an immunity-dependent manner. A Immunoblot analysis confirmed efficient knockdown of Nsun2 in LLC cells and its complete knockout in KP cells. B CCK-8 analysis of the proliferation of LLC and KP cells following Nsun2 depletion or pharmacological inhibition of NSUN2 with MY-1B (20µM) ( n = 3 per group). C Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5 per group). D Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice (control, n = 5; NSUN2 KO, n = 6). E Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus shNsun2 LLC tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 ⁻/⁻ mice ( n = 5 per group). F Tumor growth curve (left), final tumor weight (right upper), and representative tumor images (right lower) for control versus Nsun2 KO KP tumors in immunodeficient Rag1 -/- mice ( n = 5 per group). G Schematic diagram illustrating the induction of LUAD in KrasLSL −G12D/+ , Sftpc-MerCreMer genetically engineered mice with or without conditional knockout of Nsun2. H Representative H&E‑stained lung images (left) and the corresponding tumor area annotations (right, in red) from mice with spontaneous LUAD (Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox ). Scale bar, 200 μm. I Quantification of tumor burden from the spontaneous LUAD model in Nsun2 +/+ and Nsun2 flox/flox mice ( n = 6 per group). J Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of Nsun2 +/+ versus Nsun2 flox/flox mice in the spontaneous LUAD model ( n = 7 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant

Article Snippet: For in vivo pharmacological inhibition of NSUN2, the NSUN2 inhibitor MY-1B ( T85335 , TargetMol) was encapsulated in iRGD‐functionalized liposomes (iRGD‐MY‐1B liposomes) at a concentration of 3 mg/mL (MY‐1B equivalent) and administered via tail vein injection at 30 mg/kg every three days starting on day 6 post‐implantation until sacrifice.

Techniques: Western Blot, Knockdown, Knock-Out, CCK-8 Assay, Inhibition, Control

Mechanistic model of the study. (Graphical abstract). NSUN2 enhances the translation of histone deacetylase HDAC8 in an m⁵C-YBX1-dependent manner, which in turn represses CCL5 transcription and CCR5 + CD8 + cytotoxic T cell recruitment. Inhibition of NSUN2 converted immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” ones and synergized with immunotherapy to induce potent tumor regression

Journal: Experimental Hematology & Oncology

Article Title: Tumor-intrinsic NSUN2 orchestrates immunosuppression in lung adenocarcinoma via the m 5 C-HDAC8-CCL5 axis

doi: 10.1186/s40164-026-00826-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mechanistic model of the study. (Graphical abstract). NSUN2 enhances the translation of histone deacetylase HDAC8 in an m⁵C-YBX1-dependent manner, which in turn represses CCL5 transcription and CCR5 + CD8 + cytotoxic T cell recruitment. Inhibition of NSUN2 converted immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” ones and synergized with immunotherapy to induce potent tumor regression

Article Snippet: For in vivo pharmacological inhibition of NSUN2, the NSUN2 inhibitor MY-1B ( T85335 , TargetMol) was encapsulated in iRGD‐functionalized liposomes (iRGD‐MY‐1B liposomes) at a concentration of 3 mg/mL (MY‐1B equivalent) and administered via tail vein injection at 30 mg/kg every three days starting on day 6 post‐implantation until sacrifice.

Techniques: Histone Deacetylase Assay, Inhibition

Melatonin activates AMPK signaling and enhances mitochondrial function in vitro. (A) GO enrichment bar plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Control and Melatonin-treated NSCs. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment bar plot of DEGs between Control and Melatonin groups. (C) Heatmap of selected DEGs associated with neuronal differentiation and mitochondrial function. DEGs were defined as transcripts with FDR <0.05. (D) Representative Western blots showing phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK, Thr172) and phosphorylated ACC (p-ACC, Ser79) in Control, Melatonin, Inhibitor, and Melatonin + Inhibitor groups. (E) Densitometric analysis of p-AMPK/total AMPK and p-ACC/GAPDH ratios. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ppargc1a and Tfam expression, normalized to GAPDH and presented as fold change relative to the Control group. (G) Representative Western blots of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes I-V. (H) Densitometric quantification of OXPHOS complexes I-V, normalized to GAPDH (or the corresponding loading control). (I) Representative JC-1 fluorescence images indicating mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). (J) Quantification of the red/green JC-1 fluorescence ratio from (I). (K) Schematic representation of the proposed melatonin-AMPK-ACC-PGC-1α-NRF1/TFAM signaling axis driving mitochondrial biogenesis in NSCs. All quantitative data (E, F, H, J) are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. K created with BioRender.com .

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Melatonin-incorporated brain extracellular matrix hydrogel enhances NSCs mitochondrial metabolism to promote neuroregeneration via the AMPK-PGC-1α-NRF1/TFAM axis after spinal cord injury

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.006

Figure Lengend Snippet: Melatonin activates AMPK signaling and enhances mitochondrial function in vitro. (A) GO enrichment bar plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Control and Melatonin-treated NSCs. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment bar plot of DEGs between Control and Melatonin groups. (C) Heatmap of selected DEGs associated with neuronal differentiation and mitochondrial function. DEGs were defined as transcripts with FDR <0.05. (D) Representative Western blots showing phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK, Thr172) and phosphorylated ACC (p-ACC, Ser79) in Control, Melatonin, Inhibitor, and Melatonin + Inhibitor groups. (E) Densitometric analysis of p-AMPK/total AMPK and p-ACC/GAPDH ratios. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ppargc1a and Tfam expression, normalized to GAPDH and presented as fold change relative to the Control group. (G) Representative Western blots of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes I-V. (H) Densitometric quantification of OXPHOS complexes I-V, normalized to GAPDH (or the corresponding loading control). (I) Representative JC-1 fluorescence images indicating mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). (J) Quantification of the red/green JC-1 fluorescence ratio from (I). (K) Schematic representation of the proposed melatonin-AMPK-ACC-PGC-1α-NRF1/TFAM signaling axis driving mitochondrial biogenesis in NSCs. All quantitative data (E, F, H, J) are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. K created with BioRender.com .

Article Snippet: For AMPK inhibition experiments, BAY-3827 (HY-112083, MedChemExpress, USA), a selective AMPK inhibitor, was used at a final concentration of 2 μM for 24 h. The mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using the JC-1 Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (C2003S, Beyotime Biotechnology, China).

Techniques: In Vitro, Control, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Fluorescence, Membrane

Molecular validation of neural repair and mechanism activation in spinal cord tissue. Western blot and qPCR analyses of spinal cord tissue lysates from Sham, SCI, BEM, NSCs@BEM, and NSCs@MT/BEM groups. (A) Representative Western blots for the neuronal marker TUJ1 and the glial scar marker GFAP. (B) Representative Western blots for phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), phosphorylated ACC (p-ACC), and their respective total proteins. (C) Representative Western blots for the five oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex subunits. (D) Densitometric quantification of TUJ1 and GFAP protein levels. (E) Densitometric quantification of the p-AMPK/total AMPK and p-ACC/total ACC ratios. (F) Densitometric quantification of OXPHOS complex protein levels. (G) Relative mRNA expression of neural markers (TUJ1, GFAP, Olig2) and key mitochondrial biogenesis regulators (Ppargc1a, Tfam) determined by qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Melatonin-incorporated brain extracellular matrix hydrogel enhances NSCs mitochondrial metabolism to promote neuroregeneration via the AMPK-PGC-1α-NRF1/TFAM axis after spinal cord injury

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.006

Figure Lengend Snippet: Molecular validation of neural repair and mechanism activation in spinal cord tissue. Western blot and qPCR analyses of spinal cord tissue lysates from Sham, SCI, BEM, NSCs@BEM, and NSCs@MT/BEM groups. (A) Representative Western blots for the neuronal marker TUJ1 and the glial scar marker GFAP. (B) Representative Western blots for phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), phosphorylated ACC (p-ACC), and their respective total proteins. (C) Representative Western blots for the five oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex subunits. (D) Densitometric quantification of TUJ1 and GFAP protein levels. (E) Densitometric quantification of the p-AMPK/total AMPK and p-ACC/total ACC ratios. (F) Densitometric quantification of OXPHOS complex protein levels. (G) Relative mRNA expression of neural markers (TUJ1, GFAP, Olig2) and key mitochondrial biogenesis regulators (Ppargc1a, Tfam) determined by qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: For AMPK inhibition experiments, BAY-3827 (HY-112083, MedChemExpress, USA), a selective AMPK inhibitor, was used at a final concentration of 2 μM for 24 h. The mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using the JC-1 Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit (C2003S, Beyotime Biotechnology, China).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Activation Assay, Western Blot, Marker, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing

Immune regulation and endogenous bone regeneration mechanism investigation. A) Network diagram showing the number of interactions between six subclusters. B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs in DIBS group compared to the HA group. C) Circular visualization of related pathway–gene enrichment analysis. D) Heatmap of key gene regulation in specific pathways. E) qRT-PCR validation for key gene expression in specific pathways. F) The interaction networks showing the correlation of representative immunomodulatory genes (CCL2, CCL20, Sfrp1, and Stat3, etc.) with angiogenesis/osteogenesis and macrophage regulation gene sets. G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CCR2 F4/80 macrophage in peripheral blood. H) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of macrophage polarization inside scaffolds (one week after intramuscular implantation). I) Macrophage proliferation assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. J and K) Macrophage polarization assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Spatiotemporally programming the immune-osteogenic cascade with a dual-immunomodulatory scaffold for functional bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immune regulation and endogenous bone regeneration mechanism investigation. A) Network diagram showing the number of interactions between six subclusters. B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs in DIBS group compared to the HA group. C) Circular visualization of related pathway–gene enrichment analysis. D) Heatmap of key gene regulation in specific pathways. E) qRT-PCR validation for key gene expression in specific pathways. F) The interaction networks showing the correlation of representative immunomodulatory genes (CCL2, CCL20, Sfrp1, and Stat3, etc.) with angiogenesis/osteogenesis and macrophage regulation gene sets. G) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CCR2 F4/80 macrophage in peripheral blood. H) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of macrophage polarization inside scaffolds (one week after intramuscular implantation). I) Macrophage proliferation assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. J and K) Macrophage polarization assay in a CCR2-dependent manner. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: Throughout the experimental period, sustained CCR2 inhibition was achieved via daily intraperitoneal injections (2 mg/kg) of the highly selective CCR2 inhibitor RS504393 (Cat. No. HY-15418, MCE).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Biomarker Discovery, Gene Expression, Flow Cytometry, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Proliferation Assay

Revascularization and osteogenesis are reinforced by M2 macrophage activation via the CCL2/CCR2 pathway. A and B) HUVECs and BMSCs proliferation assay under M2 macrophage activation. Created with BioRender.com . C) Migration assay and quantification of HUVECs. D) Tube formation assay and quantification of HUVECs. E and F) Early and later osteogenic differentiation of BMSC influenced by macrophage-induced microenvironment. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05 (vs Control), ∗∗ p < 0.01 (vs Control), ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (vs Control), ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (vs Control); $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Spatiotemporally programming the immune-osteogenic cascade with a dual-immunomodulatory scaffold for functional bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Revascularization and osteogenesis are reinforced by M2 macrophage activation via the CCL2/CCR2 pathway. A and B) HUVECs and BMSCs proliferation assay under M2 macrophage activation. Created with BioRender.com . C) Migration assay and quantification of HUVECs. D) Tube formation assay and quantification of HUVECs. E and F) Early and later osteogenic differentiation of BMSC influenced by macrophage-induced microenvironment. Data are represented as means ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05 (vs Control), ∗∗ p < 0.01 (vs Control), ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (vs Control), ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 (vs Control); $ p < 0.05 (vs group without inhibitor), $$ p < 0.01 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$ p < 0.001 (vs group without inhibitor), $$$$ p < 0.0001 (vs group without inhibitor). ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: Throughout the experimental period, sustained CCR2 inhibition was achieved via daily intraperitoneal injections (2 mg/kg) of the highly selective CCR2 inhibitor RS504393 (Cat. No. HY-15418, MCE).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Proliferation Assay, Migration, Tube Formation Assay, Control